Claude code is an absolute winner for me with development, I have built and shipped http://projectclyde.app in just over a week, with me doing at most an hour a day.
OpenAI is still ahead on breadth of adoption, but Anthropic is increasingly winning on revenue, enterprise spend, and developer preference among the businesses Ramp tracks.
The distinction between adoption and spend tells the real story. OpenAI has more customers, but Anthropic has the customers spending real money. That's the difference between breadth and depth.
Ivan, thanks for the piece. Quick question: why would you say that switching costs are near zero? Are you recommending that enterprises use all 3 ( GPT, Claude and Gemini) during build so ensure agility rather than choose sides?
Claude code is an absolute winner for me with development, I have built and shipped http://projectclyde.app in just over a week, with me doing at most an hour a day.
OpenAI is still ahead on breadth of adoption, but Anthropic is increasingly winning on revenue, enterprise spend, and developer preference among the businesses Ramp tracks.
The distinction between adoption and spend tells the real story. OpenAI has more customers, but Anthropic has the customers spending real money. That's the difference between breadth and depth.
The race is heating up!
100%
90% Using AI to do our work faster... It's the new stuff AI creates that never existed before that could be the asymmetric bet
When using Opus 4.6 you do feel something has fundamentally changed. "Taste" is almost there, and sometimes even offers ideas. Its pretty incredible.
Ivan, thanks for the piece. Quick question: why would you say that switching costs are near zero? Are you recommending that enterprises use all 3 ( GPT, Claude and Gemini) during build so ensure agility rather than choose sides?