15 Comments
User's avatar
Daniel Ionescu's avatar

Very well researched piece, Ivan. There's a lot in here worth stealing.

The freemium point is clever. So is turning engineers into marketers and treating daily releases as part of growth rather than a separate department.

The only caution is that not every startup can pull this off now.

Once a wave like vibe coding has already thrown up a few giants, the same playbook gets much harder to repeat.

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thank you Daniel!

Dr. Michael Meneghini's avatar

Lovableโ€™s rapid $400M ARR shows the power of organic growth done right

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thank you Michael!

Dennis Berry's avatar

This shows how disciplined execution, clear playbooks, and leveraging the right tools like AI CRMs can turn ambition into measurable, fast-moving results

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Indeed, cheers Dennis!

John Brewton's avatar

Distribution and product working together is hard to beat.

Luis Llorens's avatar

crazy growth

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

โค๏ธ

Champ's avatar

Great breakdown. Just something I think would make the breakdowns more actionable would be focusing a bit more on how they got their initial users (i.e. how did lovable get the initial users for the github repo.).

I believe this is also largely applicable in cases such as harvey or granola, where the way they got the first few users is important.

Love the breakdowns. Keep them coming.

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thank you Champ, super helpful feedback.

Please keep it coming ๐Ÿ™

Mark S. Carroll's avatar

Ivan, this is a genuinely useful teardown because you did the rare thing and treated โ€œgrowthโ€ like an operating system, not a list of tactics.

Two things I keep circling:

1. โ€œFreemium as marketing budgetโ€ is a killer reframing. Whatโ€™s the control metric youโ€™d use to keep that from turning into an infinite cost sink? (Something like marginal paid conversion per free compute dollar, or a Lovable Score threshold that decides who gets how much runway?)

2. Daily shipping + beeswarming sounds like a compounding loop, but it also smells like it could collapse into noise if the cadence outruns comprehension. Whatโ€™s the simplest guardrail youโ€™ve seen that keeps โ€œaliveโ€ from becoming โ€œexhaustingโ€? (Release notes taxonomy, โ€œone promise per week,โ€ a hard cap on tier-one launches, etc.)

Also, Daily Active Apps as a north star is smart because it measures both sides of the marketplace. If you had to add one second metric to prevent gaming, what would it be? (Published apps with repeat end-user sessions? Active apps with meaningful external traffic? Something else.)

Either way, great piece. This is the kind of breakdown founders can actually steal from.

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thanks Mark those are great questions, noting them down for a follow-up drop on this. ๐Ÿ™

Juan Salas-Romer's avatar

Great piece Ivan. Fascinating model to learn from.

Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thank you Juan!