10 Comments
User's avatar
Alex Randall Kittredge's avatar

Love the โ€œriver of AI capitalโ€ concept!

Expand full comment
Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thanks Alex!

Expand full comment
John Brewton's avatar

Systems of action feels like the real battleground once intelligence stops being rare.

Expand full comment
Ivan Landabaso's avatar

๐ŸŽฏ

Expand full comment
Dennis Berry's avatar

Yes there is a lot of Ai out there but very few high quality, IMHO

Expand full comment
Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Tell me more, what do you mean?

Expand full comment
Melanie Goodman's avatar

Iโ€™m firmly in the โ€œsystems of actionโ€ camp. Once intelligence becomes widely available, advantage shifts to whoever controls decisions, flow and accountability. Which layer do you think will struggle most to make that jump into coordination?

Expand full comment
Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Great question. I suspect this ranking, from hardest to easiest (although I could be very wrong here):

1. Incumbents: due to cannibalising their own products.

2. Models: harder to outsource all that trust layer to 1 vendor.

3. Vertical AI platforms going horizontal.

There's also a category here which are players attempting to go horizontal since inception, and trust-layer point solutions that could also go horizontal.

What do you think?

Expand full comment
Petar Dimov's avatar

The framing around intelligence becoming cheap while judgment and coordination remain scarce is especially sharp. โ€œSystems of actionโ€ feels like a useful lens for understanding where durable power and real moats may form next as AI commoditizes

Expand full comment
Ivan Landabaso's avatar

Thanks Petar :)

Expand full comment